Large Blue Triangle Hovers Near Facility, March 2023
Civilian reports featureless triangular object with erratic motion over Pacific Time Zone security site.
Mar 23, 2026
Pacific Time Zone
PURSUE Program
AI Disclosure Brief
AI assistedReported Object Read
Large blue featureless triangular object hovered stationary above or near a national security facility for three minutes, emitting whitish blue light from perimeter points, then moved higher in jerking manner for total eight minutes at night.
Notable Characteristics
- Color: blue
- Luminosity: powerful whitish blue light from multiple perimeter points
- Size: large
Reported Motion
- stationary hover then jerking/backing up inconsistent with jet propulsion
Evidence Notes
- Eyewitness report summarized in declassification request
- Civilian observation via personal cellular device
Redacted emails detail a civilian's report of a triangular object with anomalous motion near a security facility, approved for unclassified use after review.
Triangle
VISUAL
90%
Prosaic Leads
- Possible drone misidentification despite witness opinion
- Optical illusion or atmospheric phenomenon at night
Anomalous Indicators
- Jerking motion inconsistent with conventional propulsion
- Featureless large triangle emitting perimeter lights
- Stationary hover near sensitive site
Evidence Gaps
- No sensor data or photos; eyewitness only
- Redacted attachments including IIR and draft report
- Precise location, date, and facility unspecified
Evidence Quotes // source statements
Open archive"An individual reported observing a large blue featureless triangular object with a solid, unwavering silhouette emitting powerful "whitish blue" light from multiple points along its perimeter."
Unknown speaker, Information Disclosure Analyst / Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security
Summary of reported appearance in declassification request email.
"The reporter described the object as "hovering" stationary above or near a national security facility for approximately three minutes. They then reported observing it move to a position higher in their field of view. The reporter characterized the object's motion as "backing up" in a "jerking" or "jumping" manner inconsistent with "smooth" jet propulsion."
Unknown speaker, Information Disclosure Analyst / Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security
Summary of reported behavior in declassification request email.
"Reporter stated they 'didn't think' the object was a drone."
Unknown speaker, Civilian reporter
Other observations in event summary.
Pattern Mesh // linked sightings
No mesh nodes yet. As more vault dumps land, this graph teeth out.
Chronology Trace // before & after
No dated sibling signals are available yet.
Official Files // source material
1 linkedDOW-UAP-D51, Email Correspondence, Pacific Time Zone, March 2023
(b) (6) Good morning! Thank you for your patience on this-- like I said, this was a first for me. Upon consulting internally here at HQ, our folks confirmed we do have the authority to process this as a derivative classification review, instead of a declassification request. Based upon the summary you provided below, I concur with using this at the UNCLASSIFIED level in your product. Consider your request approved. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do for you! Thanks, (b) (6) OSI CI Collections and Operations PM Intelligence Oversight PM (b) (6) (b) (6) 1.4(a) Good morning, Thank you for your request. Our process for declassifying IIRs is lengthy and requires AFOSI Commander signature so I'm exploring options akin to a security review of the UNCLASS summary